Improved PhilHealth services

Daily dose, , ,

After three days, my youngest was finally discharged from the hospital yesterday. This wasn’t his first hospital admission so we were more familiar with the discharge procedures. So after completing the paperwork and settling the part of the hospital bill that wasn’t covered by our HMO and PhilHealth, it was a pleasant surprise when an actual PhilHealth employee came to see us for a quick interview/survey.

The PhilHealth employee courteously introduced herself as someone directly assigned to monitor the state insurer’s services at the hospital we stayed at. She wen through our bill, clearly explaining how the PhilHealth coverage was like that and the amount it covered, which was significantly larger compared to the last time my youngest, or any of us, was admitted for hospital treatment.

She then went on to ask us if the hospital asked us to make a cash deposit prior to admission, as this was against PhilHealth’s ‘zero balance billing’ program. I replied in the negative. Then her next was question was whether or not there were any difficulties availing of PhilHealth services, again I replied in the negative. Come to think of it, we’ve never had any difficulties availing services from PhilHealth. It seems that this is advantage of having up to date records and continuous contributions since I joined the formal labor sector a little more than a decade ago.

Still, it’s a wonderful experience to see first hand some good customer service from a government agency such as PhilHealth. Hopefully it continues to improve, especially the coverage it provides as for other Filipinos, PhilHealth is the only means they are able to get some form of healthcare services in this country known for crushing poverty amidst healthcare services that are not only woefully inadequate, but also criminally expensive and unaffordable.

A far-right group of Filipinos have been recently gaining traction on social media. They organized an online webinar purportedly to teach the art of debate, riding on the popularity of late Christian nationalist celebrity, Charlie Kirk. They made a claim that “truth varies according to respective ideologies” then say that only conservatives guard “timeless truths” is a laughable self-contradiction.

Then again, it’s not much of a surprise since their group worships someone whose style of “debate” is built on rapid-fire fallacies, selective use of facts and bad-faith framing.

On being more tolerant towards theists

Opinion, , , ,

Around a decade or so ago, I’ve decided not to engage in debates about religion – the interpretation of the Bible, which religion is THE religion or trying to win over believers that there is no such thing as a divine being, etc as I’ve come to accept that it is anyone’s right whether they would believe in it or not, whether they would join one religion or another.

However, when one’s religion or their own interpretation of what ever text they consider holy, is used to abuse and mistreat, to oppress, marginalize, and limit the agency of members of certain communities including the LGBTQIA+ communities, then I would spare some time to address it, expose it and call it out for what it is. I may not have all the answers, but someone has to make a stand and speak up.

During my college years, most anti-activists I’ve encountered on campus were deans, department chairs and professors. With all sorts of letters after their names. One wasn’t even shy preaching about how schools should remain neutral and defending the policies of then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in one breath.